Ashton Whiteley Scam Illustrates Financial Crime

  • Security , Compliance
  • 12.01.2021 08:59 pm

The Ashton Whiteley Scam illustrates how financial crime really works. Not a lot of personal cases were shared with the public before in order to make financial crime tangible. Here is an outline of events of a victim of the Ashton Whiteley Scam a couple of years ago.

Professional looking e-mail and information leaflet

On the 10th of July 2017, a man was approached by a lady who called herself Julia Wright. She came across asa professional; introducing the company she works for as a well-known, reputable and solid firm, operating in the financial world with customers from all over the world. Because of expansion ideas in Europe, the company approached a selected number of potential investors for their future plans. The meeting via conference call was confirmed with a professional looking e-mail and an information leaflet was included as attachment. He was asked to fill out an account application form

Nothing negative or dodgy after researching

Ten days later, on July 20th, he was contacted by a person who called herself Silly Magrath, acting as a trading officer of Ashton Whiteley and offering him 100 shares in a company called Electronic Arts (EA) for a value of €8819,50. The outlook was a nice return of investment within just three months. In the meantime, he investigated Ashton Whiteley and Electronic Arts. He found nothing negative or dodgy. There were lots of published articles, nice websites and many (independent) economical press releases about the companies they trade in and so on. Even after extensiveresearch,the company and the references given appeared to be solid, plausible and serious.

Upon request, even a native Dutch speaking reference was givenand the man spoke to the Dutch man on the phone, whowas also using a local Dutch phonenumber. He used the name of Victor Borgdorff, speaking in an educated and well-mannered way. He was giving all kinds of positive references on Ashton Whiteley and the professional financial services he enjoyed from them.

Cash in the money, but only if it could be traded against another stock

Unfortunately, the man accepted the proposal and the scam began. In the following period, he was contact by Paul Mitchel and Michael King, just to inform him that histrade position was doing great and that everything was going just as planned, in order for the shares to gain a lot of value in about 90 days.They talked about a big announcement of which they had inside information which would be shared afterwards.

On September 4th, the man was contacted by a man using the name of Robert Brady, who presented himself as the Senior Vice President of Ashton Whiteley. He approached him with the message that Electronic Arts(EA) made a big jump in share price.He advised him to cash in the money, but only if it could be traded against another stock. So instead of receiving money, he would be acquiring shares in a company called Lectrifi (LECT). The 100 shares in EA would trade for 6.485 shares of LECT. Lectrifi would be going to the stock market and with this, he could gain a nice profit. However, trading in LECT could only be done in blocks of 20.000, thus the man was required to buy an additional 13.515 shares in LECT at a price of €2.00 each + 1% transfer costs; a total sum of €27.301,30. Up to that moment, hespent €36.120,80on this ‘opportunity’.

Making sure regulations were followed

On September 26th, Robert Brady called again about a volume trading deal by a hedge fund in which the man had to participate in order not to lose his money. Usually, only trades would take place in blocks of 100.000 shares, but in this case he could merge the account with another client who was 50.000 shares short from a full block of 100.000. An additional investment in 30.000 shares was required at €2,00 + 1% fee; a total of €60.600,-. Within six weeks, around November 7th, the shares would be sold at € 5.50. After every transaction, the ‘client’ was transferred to the so called compliance officer, whoused the name of William Danks. He was there to guaranteethat all the regulations were followed. He was assured that Ashton Whiteley was legitimate.

On October 26th, Robert Brady called again. Trading in merged accounts which usually wasn’t an issue was no longer allowed. The man had to buy another 50.000 shares orhis total amount would be lost. Of course, the other client did not want to buy him 50.000 shares which he proposed. With increasing reluctance, he forwarded €101.000, in this case to the Mashreq Bank. Also, heasked for a certificate, proving his ownership of the shares. In the meantime, he contacted Mister Michael Beaumont, who was acting as the Investor Relations officer for Lectrifi and asked if he could verify the shares certificate, which he did.

Additional investments

On November 7th, the man had to put up a deposit of 20% of the stock value as a bond security, in other words a total of €108.900,- which he would get back after 14 days – a so called cooling off period – and it would give him a reward of 3%. In return, the man would get 54.450 units in his name as a security mechanism. On November 13th, he received a phone call from William Danks, the allocation officer, with the messagethat the money could not be transferred to accountnumber 023 418205 838 of MINGCIFAR Limited Hong Kong at the HSBC Hong Kong, because of tax threshold levels being reached. The man had to do a swift recall. On November 17th, he received the money, €108.900,-back on his account. The same day, the man transferred this amount to beneficiary HK lemon Trade company in Hong Kong on bank account number 933 078313 883 at the Hang Seng Bank.    

On December 7th, Robert Brady called again. From the 25 clients, one had dropped out, so the total amount of shares had to be divided up over the remaining 24 investors. An additional investment in 83.334 shares + 1% fee equals €168.334,68 was absolutely required. The security deposit was covered, so only another €168.334,68 was needed. The transfer was made to account 369 317102 883 on behalf of Chengyu Trade Limited at the Hang Seng Bank.

On 08thJanuary 2018, an equity deposit was required. Equaling 87.121 shares, no fee charges and €174.242,- was sent to account 369 317102 883 on behalf of Chengyu Trade Limited at the Hang Seng Bank. On January 17th, Robert Brady said that one of the founders of Lectrifi was dumping a large number of shares into the market. These 2.5 million shares had to be bought up by the remaining shareholders. Robert Brady said that these shares needed to be bought in order to save the deal. Again, a large amount €214.625,00 was paid to account 369 317102 883 on behalf of Chengyu Trade Limited at the Hang Seng Bank. 

Enormous psychological pressure

On January 24th, the man received a call from an unfriendly man who called himself Mirko Kostas, acting as director of Mergers and Acquisitions. He told him that Robert Brady was suspended, because he helped his clients too much. That he did things he was not allowed to do, such as not charging for the security deposit on the last transaction. In order to save the investment, the man had to come up with a deposit of €164.094,00. He even confirmed this in writing. The transfer was made to account 369 317102 883 on behalf of Chengyu Trade Limited at the Hang Seng Bank.

On February 5th, the man received an e-mail and phonecall from Mirko Kostas about a very unfortunate situation. An agent discovered that one of the clients is a director of Lectrifi. That would be considered inside trading and that is not allowed. There are 6 million shares that need to be picked up by the other investors. The security was covered. The man was required to buy an additional 260.870 shares in Lectrifi for an amount of €521.740,00. The pressure from Mirko Kostas was enormous. In this case, a last payment of €100.000 was made.

On February 6th, Mirko Kostas requested an additional investment. The man felt enormous psychological pressure.After this, many more phonecalls have followed, trying to get more money from him. This whole fraud incident by the Ashton Whiteley group has been reported to the local authorities, but has not been resolved to this day.

The victim’s feelings

Despite many attempts from both the victim and his lawyer to get the police and prosecutor to take on the case, after nearly three years a letter from the Court of Amsterdam was received. Apparently, solving this type of fraud is considered of no importance to society. With this letter,the victim got the impression that the hunting season for scammers is facilitated, by which they can attack innocentinvestors.

After being let down by the police and prosecutor, victims will do whatever they can to find ways to identify and recover their losses. Apparently, the authorities have other priorities. In general, banks are not as eager to solve such matters and reply accurately, using standard text emails and hiding behind insufficient protocols of privacy and KYC.

By means of private investigators, internet searches and through social media victims can find out that there are more victims out there and that this‘disease’ of professional and large scale fraud has spread throughout Europe, similar to Covid-19 and most likely throughout the whole world. Fortunately, there are groups like investment-scam-asia and ELFRI based in Austria that gather the interest of victims and take charge.  



About Risk & Compliance Platform Europe

Risk & Compliance Platform Europe started in 2014. The platform is a cross-border, interactive platform that publishes in nine languages, namely English, French, Dutch, German, Italian, Polish, Romanian, Bulgarian and now also recently, Czech-Slovakian. The platform is for all professionals working in the field of risk and compliance in the financial world, at large and medium-sized companies and in the public sector. Not only risk and compliance managers / officers are part of the target audiences, but also business and general managers, who are confronted with the increased risks and regulatory pressure from both national and international government bodies and supervisors. Obviously, the content via the Risk & Compliance Platform Europe is also of interest to supervisors, accountants, controllers, auditors and lawyers.The nine platforms each have their own content, which is different from the other language sites. Risk & Compliance Platform Europe is a leading news website and open forum. Thus professional visitors may formulate their own opinions. More via

Related News