CPEC Fiscal Cost More Manageable Than Feared

CPEC Fiscal Cost More Manageable Than Feared
01.02.2017 09:00 am

CPEC Fiscal Cost More Manageable Than Feared

Infrastructure

Our analysis of fiscal costs related to CPEC reinforces our positive view – We are more comfortable with fiscal risks associated with the China Pakistan Economic Corridor as a result of the analysis presented in this report; this reinforces our positive thesis on Pakistan equities. Our top stock picks are UBL, HBL, BAFL in Banks, INDU, PSMC in Autos, MLCF in Cement, KEL in Utilities.
US$15.5bn worth of “priority” power generation projects – CPEC refers to cUS$54bn of projects, comprised initially of US$46bn of power, port, road, rail and pipeline infrastructure and recently increased by US$8bn of LNG and additional rail. Within this there are US$15.5bn worth of “priority” power projects and within this figure there are US$12bn of projects which have agreed tariffs and achieved financial close. Most of these projects have (1) a debt:equity ratio of 75:25 with the bulk of debt financed by Chinese banks (the foreign currency requirement for machinery imports is generally beyond the capability of local banks which are flush with local, not foreign, currency liquidity); (2) a government guarantee of RoEs of up to c25% in US$ terms; and (3) sufficient revenues to cover debt servicing and repayment over the first decade of operation.
Worst case, a manageable 0.3% added to 2.9% 2018 fiscal deficit – In the absence of resolving (1) electricity network theft and non-payment of bills, and (2) low tax collection (ie insufficient tax compliance as opposed to hiking tax rates on the existing small compliant base), both of which require the political will, generally absent, to challenge vested interests, the risks are that, respectively, (1) “circular debt” fiscal liabilities increase, ie the shortfall in revenue collection relative to guaranteed returns to capital providers, and (2) tax receipts on the incremental GDP growth, resulting from more continuous power supply, are deficient. The overall risk is that the net effect, from a fiscal balance perspective, is that the contingent fiscal costs of meeting government guarantees may significantly outweigh the fiscal revenue benefits of greater tax collection. The chart illustrates different scenarios on network theft, non-payment, GDP growth boost and incremental tax collection rates and suggests that the worst case scenario over the first decade of these “priority” power projects is an annual fiscal liability of US$1bn, which equates to 0.32% of 2018f nominal GDP of at least cUS$315bn and compares to IMF estimates of a 2018 fiscal deficit of 2.9%.
Useful infrastructure not Sri Lanka's Chinese "white elephants" – The list of allprojects under the original US$46bn CPEC umbrella (split 35% priority power generation, 41% other power generation, 14% roads, 8% rail, 2% port) suggests there is useful infrastructure, which should ultimately benefit the wider economy. To us, this looks, in general, like the useful parts of the Chinese financed infrastructure seen in Sri Lanka (the Colombo airport terminal, airport-city motorway and, potentially, the Colombo seaport rather than the redundant airport, port and cricket stadium in Hambantota). The fiscal scenarios above suggest that, at least in the case of the priority energy projects, the fiscal burden should be more manageable, in the worst case scenario, than that seen in Sri Lanka (where expensive debt finance has led to defaults, debt-equity swaps and protracted renegotiation). While CPEC should have positive externalities for wider local economy, once constructed, it remains our view that in its construction phase it will be financed, built and owned largely by Chinese entities, with the exception of local Cementcompanies (irrespective of the claims from most Pakistani corporate management we meet who, in our view, misrepresent the construction of CPEC as a major growth opportunity). In the near term, the most important benefit of CPEC is that it creates an overlapping interest in domestic security between Pakistan’s military and civilian political elite and its key geopolitical sponsor (in contrast to historic relationships with the US and Saudi which arguably cared more for an aligned military than domestic security).

Related News

IPC Announces Expanded Partnership With Beeks Financial Cloud

... Read more »

Database Monitoring Shown to Improve DevOps Success for Financial Services

A newly released Financial Services edition of Redgate’s 2020 State of Database Monitoring Report reveals the sector is outperforming... Read more »

Atos Becomes Strategic Partner of Student Loans Company

The Student Loans Company (SLC) has appointed Atos, a global leader in digital transformation, to support the delivery of improvements to SLC’... Read more »

25,000 People Pre-register for Chip’s Biggest Funding Round Yet

Chip, the automatic saving app offering access to market leading returns, is about to launch its biggest funding round yet to a record number of pre-registrations. The company... Read more »

Apex Partners with Calypso to Provide Middle and Back-office Services to Ardent Financial

Apex Group Ltd. (“Apex”), a global financial services provider, announces today that it has been appointed to provide front to back office solutions to FCA... Read more »

New Free Whitepaper Helps FSI Businesses Achieve Digital Transformation- Fincons Group

Today, Fincons Group, an international system integration consultancy with offices in Italy, Switzerland, the UK, France, the U.S. and Germany, releases a new free guide to... Read more »

Magazine
ALL
Free Newsletter Sign-up
+44 (0) 208 819 32 53 +44 (0) 173 261 71 47
Download Our Mobile App
Financial It Youtube channel