Tipping the balance – is there a future for legacy platforms in payments?

Bethan Cowper

Head of Global Marketing at Compass Plus

Views 932

Tipping the balance – is there a future for legacy platforms in payments?

22.04.2016 10:30 am

Discussions around legacy payment platforms always generate heated debate. Whilst these antiquated systems were not built to fare the pressures of today, the fact that so many high-profile and successful financial institutions continue to build upon infrastructure first implemented in the 1970s can go far in illustrating the longevity of this technology.

The debate over the shelf-life of legacy has been rife for nearly a decade. Has the time finally come for the scales to no longer be balanced in their favour? Whilst the old adage “if it ain’t broke…don’t fix it” has become the tagline for older technology, there is only so long that the cost and inconvenience of maintaining legacy systems outweighs the cost and advantages of replacement.

Out-dated systems have continued to survive the battle for numerous and very relevant reasons. The cost, risk, time (not necessarily for implementation, but certainly to retrain end-users), size and complexity of these projects have led FIs to continue with their stable, tried-and-tested mainframes, or at the very least, to look for alternative solutions whilst keeping these systems at the core.

In recent years, FIs have begun to invest more heavily in new technology, however, this money is primarily budgeted for maintenance and new innovations, and very little in between. FIs must be seen by both their customers and their competition to be keeping up with the latest payment trends, whilst under the serene surface of the pond, the poor metaphorical duck is paddling like crazy. Innovation is constrained within the means of the technology in use; not only effecting how easy it is to develop and launch new products and services, but how long it takes and how much it costs in the long term.

Alternative solutions like wraparounds offer FIs the opportunity to squeeze another couple of years out of their legacy systems, but are these shorter term solutions worth it? Wraparounds essentially offer the same advantages as sticking a plaster on technology to see how long it holds. Whilst an added standard access layer enables easier integration and offers the advantage of XML-based web services and portal frameworks, the fundamental constraints of legacy still apply; from communications through to security.

Historically, the less costly methodology of quickly ‘enhancing’ legacy systems has only added operational complexity to these environments leading to spaghetti-like systems that are more intricate and harder to navigate than ever before. Add to this, instances of acquisitions and mergers between FIs over time, and the architectural integrity of the systems is put under more pressure. High profile system crashes splashed across the pages of both industry and international newspapers only add fuel to the fire. It is reasonable to state that these platforms are no longer getting the job done as well as they used to.

Ultimately the lifespan of legacy systems is intrinsically linked to the staff that maintains them, and when those employees retire, their replacements will be unfamiliar with this technology and not have the correct skillset for legacy to continue to be a viable option. CIOs are currently undergoing a skill shortage and according to a recent survey carried out by Vanson Bourne, 61 per cent of CIOs believe this will result in severely reduced productivity and increased application risk that will leave businesses more vulnerable to external attacks or system crashes. However, nearly half of these CIOs admit they have not devised any formal plans to tackle the impending issue and IT teams are left to deal with the inherited consequences of their FI’s technology.

Payment system modernisation can reduce processing costs, significantly reduce operational risk and help with compliance. New systems offer more flexible workflows and the opportunity to collect and analyse big data which, if used properly, can lead to increased customer acquisition and retention. Whether or not to replace, wraparound or even outsource an FI’s business involves some serious consideration. In order to make the optimal decision, FIs need to analyse their options versus requirements, and the value versus cost so as not to start a repetitive cycle of rip and replace as technology continues to evolve.

Regardless of the path an FI takes, this decision is not to be taken lightly. Instead of seeing the issues and costs, it would be beneficial to view the experience as an opportunity. This shouldn’t be a simple like-for-like replacement, upgrade or outsource, it is the strategic transformation of systems into future-proof, revenue growing assets. What is becoming abundantly clear is that the debate to move away from legacy is no longer about should we, but when should we. FIs need to have a strategy in place and be in the process of actualising it before the scales finally fall out of favour with legacy and tip in the opposite direction with dire consequences.

Latest blogs

Christian Voigt Fidessa

Who Makes the Decisions Around Here?

Recording the execution decision maker is a new requirement under MiFID II. Working out how to populate that field turns out to be trickier than expected. Read more »

Avi Ghosh SIX Securities Services

Day one at Sibos: David and all the Goliaths

The SIX Securities Services team were in high spirits as Sibos kicked off in Toronto yesterday. Read more »

Dharmesh Mistry Temenos

How Banks Can Beat the Tech Giants at Data

It’s all about data ecosystems… There’s a long tradition of using time in the bathroom to think and reflect. For the ancient Greek mathematician Archimedes, his understanding of how to measure volume fell into place when he was in the bath. For me, Read more »

Brian Gregory Wolters Kluwer

When the Numbers Are No Longer Enough: Demonstrable Governance

The increased number of rules and regulations issued by both domestic and international regulators has become overwhelming.  Many financial services firms have solved for this by implementing one or more technology platforms to allow for an Read more »

Sacey Small The Glue

Innovation: A New World for Banking or A New Bank for the World?

The word innovate was first recorded in 1540.  Somewhat surprising, to hear people banging on about it like it’s a revolution. What does innovation mean? And is innovation really ‘a new world for banking’ or should it be ‘a new bank for the world?’ Read more »

Related Blogs

Brian Lawlor Wirecard

The expansion of Wirecard – A Key Landmark in Global Spread of Mobile Payments?

Statista expects that there will be a staggering 5.07 billion mobile phone owners worldwide by 2019. This one huge number quite simply shows the overall potential market for mobile payments even in the short term. Meanwhile Gartner has estimated Read more »

Oscar Nieboer Paysafe

What’s the Future of Cash?

It’s no secret. Businesses live or die based on adaptability. Those adept at anticipating and preparing for change can unlock huge new opportunities. And those that don’t move with the times will inevitably get left behind.  In payments, Read more »

Simon Black PPRO Group

Do We Really Need a New £10 Note?

On September 14, the Bank of England is set to replace the classic £10 note with a polymer alternative. The £10 paper banknote is the oldest Bank of England banknote currently in circulation, and is in need of being updated to take advantage of Read more »

Simon Black PPRO Group

10th Anniversary of Contactless Payments

The share of contactless payments will more than triple in the next five years to almost eradicate cash in the UK. As we mark the 10th anniversary of the first contactless payment, it begs the question whether the new five and ten-pound notes will Read more »

Simon Black PPRO Group

In the Digital Age, Cashless Payment Methods are King

The UK is swiftly moving towards a new cultural phenomenon – the cashless society. In fact, our latest research[1] shows, that if given the option, 26% of us would never choose to pay cash when buying an item in a shop and more than a quarter of us Read more »

Magazine
ALL
Free Newsletter Sign-up
+44 (0) 208 819 32 53, +44 (0) 173 261 71 47 Download Our Mobile App