UK Faster Payment System Prompts Changes to Fraud Regulation

UK Faster Payment System Prompts Changes to Fraud Regulation

Steven Murdoch

Innovation Security Architect at OneSpan

Views 1931

UK Faster Payment System Prompts Changes to Fraud Regulation

29.10.2018 01:00 pm

Banking transactions are rapidly moving online, offering convenience to customers and allowing banks to close branches and re-focus on marketing more profitable financial products. At the same time, new payment methods, like the UK’s Faster Payment System, make transactions irrevocable within hours, not days, and so let recipients make use of funds immediately.

However, these changes have also created a new opportunity for fraud schemes that trick victims into performing a transaction under false pretences. For example, a criminal might call a bank customer, tell them that their account has been compromised, and help them to transfer money to a supposedly safe account that is actually under the criminal’s control. Losses in the UK from this type of fraud were £145.4 million during the first half of 2018 but importantly for the public, such frauds fall outside of existing consumer protection rules, leaving the customer liable for sometimes life-changing amounts.

The human cost behind this epidemic has persuaded regulators to do more to protect customers and create incentives for banks to do a better job at preventing the fraud. These measures are coming sooner than UK Finance would like, but during questioning by the House of Commons Treasury Committee on Tuesday, their Chief Executive conceded that change is coming. They now focus on who will reimburse customers who have been defrauded through no fault of their own. Who picks up the bill will depend not just on how good fraud prevention measures are but how effectively banks can demonstrate this fact.

UK Faster Payment Creates an Opportunity for Social Engineering Attacks

One factor that contributed to the new type of fraud is that online interactions lack the usual cues that help customers tell whether a bank is genuine. Criminals use sophisticated social engineering attacks that create a sense of urgency, combined with information gathered about the customer through illicit means, to convince even diligent victims that it could only be their own bank calling. These techniques, combined with the newly irrevocable payment system, creates an ideal situation for criminals.

Even banking/security leaders are not confident their organisation could detect and prevent the constantly changing types of fraud. With that in mind, the regulators accept that customers can’t be expected to spot every type of fraud. Those who take reasonable measures but still fall victim should be refunded.

In these cases, who will pay for the reimbursement will depend on whether the customer was given adequate warning, whether bank fraud prevention systems were effective, and whether the bank that received the stolen funds could reasonably have done more to prevent the stolen money leaving the account.

Providing Evidence of Security

When there’s a dispute as to whether a victim should be refunded, the Financial Ombudsman Service will adjudicate. They’ve already indicated that they will take a hard line against banks making unrealistic expectations of customers. Not only will the Ombudsman expect that banks do all they reasonably could to prevent fraud, as well as giving sufficient warning to customers, but be able to provide rigorous evidence that their measures are effective, and that due care was taken of particularly vulnerable customers.

For victims of fraud, these changes can’t come soon enough. Banks and their security providers will have to step up to the challenge of not only being secure enough for their own satisfaction but be able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the public that they are continually monitoring the threat landscape and could not reasonably do anything more than they already do.

 

 

Latest blogs

Will Hurst Monevo

How to prepare for a cashless society

THE UK ranks as the world’s third most cashless country behind Canada and Sweden. Will Hurst, Head of Commercial Development at Monevo, part of Quint Group, has some thoughts on how to get ready for a world without paper and coins. 1 – Invest in Read more »

Laura Francis Form3

Why Payments- as-a Service is the first choice for Financial Institutions

More and more Financial Institutions are choosing to outsource their mission critical payments infrastructure over building or licensing legacy technology. The pace of change within the global payments technology space is still at full speed with no Read more »

Myles Dawson Adyen UK

Three ways to win shoppers during Chinese New Year (and beyond)

For us in the West, New Year feels like a distant memory. But, while we’re in the midst of ‘Dry Veganuary’, celebrations in China are just about to kick off. Read more »

Rodrigo Zepeda Storm-7 Consulting Limited

Persons With Significant Control: PSCs

From 30th June 2016 the ‘People with Significant Control’ Companies House register went live. This means that certain United Kingdom (UK) companies, Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), Societas Europaea (SE), and Eligible Scottish Partnerships ( Read more »

Philippe Carrel Finmechanics

LIBOR to survive the RFRs

Neither IBORs nor RFRs; firms should ready up to work with both types of benchmarks and reference rates for the foreseeable future.  The quantitative finance focused publications of 2019 have highlighted that replacing forward looking term rates ( Read more »

Magazine
ALL
Free Newsletter Sign-up
+44 (0) 208 819 32 53 +44 (0) 173 261 71 47
Download Our Mobile App
Financial It Youtube channel