MiFIDII: Done and Dusted?

Jonathan Wilson

Project Director at Cordium

Views 93

MiFIDII: Done and Dusted?

11.01.2018 09:00 am

Deadline day for MiFID II implementation is here.  But make no mistake – this package of EU directive and regulation will continue to have a significant impact throughout 2018.

The impact of this EU package of rules will be so enormous on the markets and product providers that it’s likely that 2018 will be a voyage of discovery.

For example, new disclosures around best execution will begin to appear in April – a great sea of additional data that managers and brokers should then build into their own best execution evaluations of the venues and counterparties they use. MiFID II requires that firms do this – but it remains to be seen how well firms use this new information to enhance their trading activities and the transparency they provide to clients.

Then there’s the MiFIR transaction reporting regime; from today onwards any investment firm that does not have a valid Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) may find it difficult to trade.  The six month’s reprieve granted by European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on 20 December 2017 was intended to support the smooth implementation of LEI requirements. But with recent reports indicating about a fifth of investment banks’ clients not having an LEI – the essential tag they will need to continue trading – it is more of a back-handed concession by ESMA that clearly places additional burdens on investment firms, from the application process to obtain these LEIs to ensuring that historic transaction reports are submitted in a timely fashion once the LEI has been issued.

There will also be an increased focus on using the data generated by MiFID II’s transaction reporting – estimated to be more than one trillion data points each year – to tackle market abuse. The increased surveillance the FCA is expected to undertake using MiFID II transaction report information may cause firms to up their own internal insider dealing and market abuse surveillance, something that the FCA is keen to encourage.

While on the product side, the whole Product Governance and Distribution framework needs to bed in, as will new costs and charges and new PRIIPs disclosures for some. There is also now talk of a follow up to MiFID II.  It is hard to see how the authorities won’t seek to standardise how data and information is disclosed between and across markets, product providers and distributors. Perhaps though “MiFID III” and the UK’s reduced (if any) role in its development post BREXIT will mark a clear decision point towards more centralisation or a step back from the seemingly voracious regulatory desire to consume data.

While the EU package of rules is enormous and in places problematic for firms, it is still much admired by supervisors around the globe, who see its enhanced levels of transparency and accountability as supervisory best practice. It’s therefore possible that other regulatory jurisdictions – including the US – may choose to implement chunks of MiFID II once the dust settles within the EU. Hong Kong has pledged to go down this road in parts, especially following its Fund Manager Code of Conduct, which will come into force in November 2018.

3 January 2018 is a date that has been etched on the minds of investment firms around the world, but MiFID II will be more Big Thud than Big Bang.  The likelihood is that many firms, even where they have technically hit the 3 January deadline, or knowingly deferred it for parts of their programme, will find there is a lot of bedding down to be done.  This will include fixing things that do not quite work and picking up on important disclosure and other new requirements that were left by the side of the road in the dash for compliance.

Latest blogs

Klaus-Michael Vogelberg Sage

2018 is Not Binary

Don’t be distracted by gadgets in Vegas, real technology innovation is happening in software architecture Read more »

John Bertrand SAP

Open Banking: Redefining the Private Banker

The acclaimed author and social commentator Malcolm Gladwell once commented, “We learn by example and by direct experience because there are real limits to the adequacy of verbal instruction”.  With Open Banking, private banking can be available to Read more »

Breana Patel Bonova Advisory

Risks of Misunderstanding Cyber Security

The financial services sector has been through tremendous adversity since the Great Recession. Institutions have emerged from the financial crisis only to find tougher regulations and constant threats from cyber attacks. In fact, these recent cyber Read more »

James Stickland Veridium

The Problem Biometric Authentication Solves for Financial Services

There's no denying that the frequency and impact of data breaches are on the rise. Every year the record for the number of individuals affected by a breach rises, with 2017 surpassing 2016 quickly. There were more than 5,000 confirmed data breaches Read more »

Ryan Erenhouse Mastercard

Dispelling the Myths: The Reality about Contactless Security

For many people, paying with a card is still associated with a “swipe” or a “dip”; however, for the owners of more than 370 million contactless cards accepted in over 8 million locations in 111 countries, they pay with a tap. Mastercard first Read more »

Magazine
ALL
Free Newsletter Sign-up
+44 (0) 208 819 32 53, +44 (0) 173 261 71 47 Download Our Mobile App