EMIR Refit - so what’s new?

  • Quinn Perrott , Co-Founder at TRAction

  • 27.01.2020 08:00 am
  • Financial

Last year, the European Commission published a series of amendments to the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (“EMIR”).

Those amendments became, known as “EMIR Refit” or “EMIR 2.1”, introduced some new definitions and obligations to the market. The updates require Financial Counterparties (“FCs”) to report on behalf of itself and Non-Financial Counterparties (NFCs) that are not subject to the clearing obligation.

But what exactly is behind EMIR Refit and what are some of the specific changes?

New definitions and categories for Financial Counterparties

The Financial Counterparties (FC) definition now includes more entities which the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) deems to pose a significant risk to the financial system.

This is the case with Alternative Investment Funds (“AIF”) and their managers. An AIF will be deemed an FC where it is managed by an Alternative Investment Fund Manager (“AIFM”) authorised or registered under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). This will also be the case when the AIF is established in the European Union (EU), regardless of the location or status of its manager.

Another key change is the introduction to the concept of Small Financial Counterparties (SFCs) which are exempt from the clearing obligation but remain subject to risk mitigation obligations, including margin requirements.

What are the new obligations or requirements?

For OTC derivative contracts, FCs will be responsible and legally liable for reporting on behalf of itself and NFCs that are not subject to the clearing obligation.

FCs will also be responsible for making sure that the details reported are correct. However, there is an obligation for the NFCs to provide the details relating to the OTC derivatives contracts that the FC is not reasonably expected to know. The NFC is responsible for the accuracy of those details.

FCs will need to set themselves up operationally to report for their NFCs, however this requirement does not come into effect until 18 June 2020.

EMIR Refit also establishes a new regime for determining when FCs and NFCs are subject to the clearing requirement, depending on whether or not their positions exceed the clearing threshold.  FCs are divided into those that exceed the specified thresholds (FC+s); and those that do not exceed the specified thresholds (FC-s).

FCs that are in the second category (FC-s) are not subject to the clearing obligation (nor are NFCs). An entity will only be a FC-s if it is below the threshold for each asset class. The current thresholds are EUR 1 billion for credit and equity OTC credit derivatives contracts (gross notional and value), and EUR 3 billion for OTC interest rate, FX and commodity derivative contracts;

What does all this mean for market participants and how should they respond?

Financial Counterparties will be responsible for reporting on behalf of any Non-Financial Counterparty, not subject to the clearing obligation (NFC-).  This means they will need to first identify which of their   trading counterparties are an NFC- (below the clearing threshold). For those that are below the threshold, they will need to request some extra details in order to fulfil trade reporting obligations.

As a case in point, ABC Broking has a diverse client base trading FX derivatives for speculative purposes. 90% of those clients are individuals but 10% are small companies. From 18 June 2020, ABC Broking will have the responsibility and liability to submit transaction reports for both itself and also its clients that are small companies.

There are two key data fields which will need to be populated in the trade report when reporting on behalf of an NFC. These are: ‘Corporate sector of the reporting counterparty’. Market participants will need to be able to collect and send to their regulatory reporting vendor which category, or categories, their Non-Financial Counterparty corresponds to.

All this means that firms will need a regulatory reporting vendor to create an extra trade report for their NFC-. Using a delegated reporting provider can significantly reduce resources allocated to trade reporting – enabling trading firms to focus on their core activities. With so many other issues for financial institutions to consider in 2020, not having to worry about another trade report may be a good way to kick-start the year.

Related Blogs

Other Blogs