Can Banks Change their Control Freak Cultures?

Can Banks Change their Control Freak Cultures?

Chris Skinner

Chairman at The Financial Services Club

Views 346

Can Banks Change their Control Freak Cultures?

05.12.2016 07:00 am

I was intrigued by a comment made by Anne Boden, founder of Starling Bank, on a panel I chaired the other day.  Anne used to work for ABN Amro, AIB and RBS, and is now a Fintech start-up and her comment went along the lines of: “I’ve now realised that the simple changes I needed to make in my old jobs would usually cost $3 million or more, and yet now I can make those changes for $3,000”.

I’ve heard this comment from another source, Monzo, where Tom states that they’ve built a full-service bank platform from scratch in months with a team of 15 for $3 million that a bank has spent $300 million to build with a team of thousands.

Equally, I recently blogged about Ant Financial and the debate we were having between a senior banker and a start-up.  That debate went along the lines of: I guarantee that ANT have not built a full-service platform marketplace for open market banking.  It takes years to do that, and they’re too young and too inexperienced.  The start-up guy just said: Well, they’ve done it and there’s 40 Chinese banks using them.

This culminates in a question I was asked in another conference that really nails the point.  The question was: today, you talk about apps, APIs, analytics and marketplaces Chris; won’t these all be irrelevant in ten years as a lot of the technology of ten years ago is the legacy issue we have today.

The nub of this is old thinking.  For most of my life, technology has been hugely capital intensive, people intensive and high cost, long-term developments.  Banks would be investing millions over multi-year cycles and would have high cost barriers which meant very detailed analysis of the return on investment and whether it was actually worth doing.  Today, it is all fast cycle micro developments, that are cheap and easy and fast.  However, if you are stuck in the old structure cycle of capital and resource intensive computing, then you cannot adapt to this fast cycle world.

That is the fundamental issue the old bankers were referencing in my opening statements: they’re stuck with old technology.1  Now, regular readers will know that I talk about this problem a lot – legacy systems – and how to replace them, but this is a different emphasis as another dialogue started the other day about using cryogenic freezing to replace the old systems.

So basically, you convert functions and processes piece by piece to an app, API, analytic and then put that out into the marketplace as brand new and shiny tech.  Eventually, you can do this through all the operations and find that you’re now in an open marketplace and have managed to shift off the old tech.

That’s a multiyear enterprise strategy again, which needs vision and leadership, but it can be done.  However, there are two issues in a bank in dealing with this change.

The first is how to even contemplate the changes, as there are other things happening that must be done too, much of it regulatory and much of it that means those large-scale old systems need to be changed first.  Those regulatory changes eat all the budget as, even its just tinkering with a few lines of code in the old systems, it means multiple impacts across gazillions of lines of code.  All of that needs checking and checking again, before going live, so that is why it becomes a resource intensive change program and costs millions.  That is why banks have little budget for innovation because most of it gets eaten by those old systems and, as so many COOs say, the focus is just to keep the lights on.

Let’s consider that a bank can re-engineer its way out of that mess, and start to move to Open Banking based on apps, APIs and analytics, what’s the problem then?  Well, there is one and it’s a bit of an elephant in the room.

I have referenced it before and it’s about a new organisational structure based upon moving from macro and monolithic to micro and empowered. Banks don’t like micro and empowered.  Banks are control freaks and don’t like open and fast cycle change.  It needs to be slow and controlled … oh, and compliant.  This means moving to a microservices architecture – which is what today’s agile, cheap, fast and easy technologies demand – is difficult for an institution that culturally is driven by control and compliance.

In discussing this, I usually say that a microservices organisation has developer teams of no more than two pizzas in size.  That’s a team that can be fed by two pizzas for lunch.  If the team needs three pizzas, the team is too big.  Small, nimble, agile teams that can change things fast.

So let’s imagine a bank creates a microservices developer organisation.  Each of the teams in that organisation own their piece of code.  Each team can change their code fast and replug it back into the architecture.  They own the code and no one needs to sign off on it.  And there’s the rub.  Can a bank release its control freakery to allow legions of rocket scientist developers to do their own thing?

If they can, then a bank can reboot itself every day.  There are some that do this. CBW in the USA, the power behind Moven and Simple and run by an ex-Google engineer, can update their core systems several times a week.  But an incumbent bank?  Really?  Would an incumbent bank allow developers to rejig code with empowerment?  I don’t think so for two reasons.

First, the bank has a control freak culture.  Second, a bank has leadership who have no idea what I’m blogging about1 (another regular mantra).

Maybe I’m wrong … let me know.

Latest blogs

Danny Scott CoinCorner

Bitcoin: An Explosive 2020?

“By now, a lot of people have heard of Bitcoin. It’s been running consistently for just over 11 years and has enjoyed it’s fair share of positive and negative media attention. Many eyes have been on Bitcoin since the bull run of 2017, with people Read more »

Bernard Foot MYHSM

Use of cash after COVID-19

Recently, I looked at the question of whether using cash presented more of a COVID-19 health risk than using contactless. There was no convincing evidence either way, but it’s clear that there’s a sentiment against handling cash and Read more »

Shaun Collings Pure Storage

Change Starts from Within: Overcoming Digital Transformation Barriers in the Public Sector

Across the public sector there are various forms of digital transformation taking place, at different stages of progress.  Part of the driver for this is that citizens now expect a level of service akin to what they receive from private Read more »

Jonas Andersson Fingerprints

In Consumer Biometrics We Trust: Authentication For the Data Privacy Age

Data privacy is high on the global agenda. In the wake of data protection policies such as Europe’s GDPR, ensuring the integrity of personal data is an increasingly pertinent subject. This is a governmental and corporate policy reflection of the Read more »

John Burgos Mindgate Solutions

Overcoming anxiety around mobile payments & digital payments - In the South Asia Pacific

Innovation and technology usually go hand in hand.  Therefore, for innovation to be fully realized, the technology that enables the innovation must be adopted as well.  During the last 5 years, we have had innovations from Google, Apple, Read more »

Related Blogs

Andrew Stevens Quadient

Banks to Defer Mortgage Payments Following Coronavirus

It’s great to see RBS leading the charge in putting customers first during a crisis – with Lloyds and TSB quickly following suit. People are talking about these policies because banks have communicated them very clearly; if you put the leg work in Read more »

Dr Bimal Roy Bhanu Ai XPRT

Are you keeping up with the Regulator?

Not many things in life are certain, but in the financial services industry it’s obvious to all participants that regulators are continually tightening the national and international governance, risk and compliance requirements. The ultimate aim for Read more »

Andrew Stevens Quadient

Banks to Use Mobile Channels and Customer Data to Differentiate Themselves in 2020

Digitally native neo-banks will continue to differentiate themselves in the market in 2020 by the experience they offer to customers. As a result, these banks will begin to pick up the critical minimum number of customers to become profitable, Read more »

Howard Schulman Lightico

New Survey Shows Banks Are Fumbling GenZ Relationships

There’s little dispute about the economic clout of Generation Z – The adults born after 1997 represent $44 billion in buying power. By 2020, they will make up 40 percent of U.S. consumers. One-quarter of the U.S. population belongs to this group, so Read more »

Sireen Lozi ProgressSoft Corporation

CBDCs: The Next Phase of Scrutiny

From banknotes, cards and mobile payments to cryptocurrencies and, more recently, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), the world is witnessing breakthroughs in financial technology. Read more »

Magazine
ALL
Free Newsletter Sign-up
+44 (0) 208 819 32 53 +44 (0) 173 261 71 47
Download Our Mobile App
Financial It Youtube channel